Thursday, May 23, 2019

China and Globalization Essay

chinas rapid ascent as one of the worlds fastest- festering economies (Adornino & Wilcox, 96) has triggered enormous attention among scholars interested not only in the political, stinting and social underpinnings of its continued growth but also in the implications of its increased integration with the global scrimping. Indeed, an examination of the unique characteristic of chinawares schooling and transition from a planned, centralized economy based on the socialist ideology to the lib datel, open- grocery store economy it is today strengthens the arguments in support of globalization.On the former(a) hand, the impact of its liberalization and democratization on Chinas poor also presents a critical view on the trade-offs of global integration. The stage for Chinas entry into the global economy was clearly set by the transition from a closed, relatively self-sufficient economy which was crystallized in the post-Mao era under Deng Xiaopings leadership in the Chinese Communist pa rty. In the late 1970s, the Party began instituting domestic stinting and social reforms mirroring its abandonment of the socialist economy and ideology in favor of neoliberal economics.(Adormino & Wilcox 96) Among the major reforms undertaken was the development and democratization of trade and merchandises, effectively allowing uncontrolled private ownership to the means of production, heretofore owned publicly, and the shift from a planned economy to a market place-oriented free trading system. (Guan, 2001118) Likewise, the Chinese government reduced fix control and intervention in economic activities as it began to adopt an Open Door policy to attract foreign direct investment and facilitate the growth of Chinas international trade.Thus, China became part of the global economy after economic liberalization and democratization. On the other hand, the countrys integration into the neoliberal world economic pose has also been the subject of much criticism. Guan (2000) notes t hat the implementation of market reforms and Chinas consequent integration drastically changed not only the countrys economic system but also important aspects of its social policy. (119) As a result of the shift to a free market economy, the States social function in the provision of welfare and security for its citizens significantly diminished.For instance, food and price subsidies have been stopped and the poor are faced with the risks of unemployment. Likewise, Guan (2001) asserts that widening social variety has also characterized modern China despite sustained economic growth and efforts at reforming social policy to provide safety nets for labor, agriculture, and other poor sectors. (243) Undoubtedly, acquaintance of both the negative and positive aspects of liberalization informs the Chinese governments attitude toward global economic integration.This is evident in the manner by which the state has controlled the pace of Chinas integration with the international economy in order to preserve social stability. (Adornino & Wilcox, 97 Yong & Moore, 117) However, Yong and Moore (2004) attribute the States waryness of completely and totally embracing globalization to its fear of the inherent weaknesses and vulnerabilities of a globalized system that could jeopardize Chinas strategic outlook as an aspiring grand great power. (117) China is thus effectively hindered from fully associating itself with the global economy due to its political identity as a socialist country and to the fact that the market reform has resulted into the further fragmentation of interests in Chinese society. Thus, it is in the most ironic sense that, as Adornino and Wilcox (2006) observe, the Chinese Communist Party legitimizes its rule and power through a flourishing capitalist economy.(100) The State is therefore careful of rushing headlong into a fully open, liberalized country since this would entail the further wearing of its power as market reforms have increasingly dev olved decision-making powers to producers and enterprise managers. (Adornino & Wilcox, 100) The further diffussion and decentralization of power threatens not only the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party but also endangers the country to social instability as the needs of its citizens become increasingly diverse and at the same time polarized between those benefitting from the market reform and those who have lost much because of it.(Adornino & Wilcox, 100) Chinas experience in globalization is arguably unique due to the governments ambivalency in adopting a clearly Capitalist stance and ideology and the pressure created by the need for social equality. Chinas integration to the global market is hampered by internal difficulties in aligning various political and economic interests. On the one hand, Chinas economic restructuring has created a rapidly growing and expanding market and trading system integrated with the international economy.On the other hand, its government has to precariously balance competing interests in social and domestic policy, resolve the problems in social inequality, and at the same time reduce its involvement in economic activities as demanded by the free market economy. Thus, while the benefits of Chinas rapidly growing economy is obvious for the elite, the host of political and social problems created in its wake also makes the majority of the Chinese people bear the brunt of the development from a clearly socialist path into an ambivalent capitalist society. Works Cited Adormino, Giovanni and Wilcox, Russel G.China Between Social Stability and Market Integration. China & World providence 14. 3(2006)95-108. Guan, Xin Ping. Chinas Social Policy Reform and Development in the Context of Marketization and Globalization. Social Policy and Administration 34. 1(2000)115-130. Guan, Xinping. Globalization, Inequality, and Social Policy China on the Treshold of Entry into the World Trade Organization. Social Policy and Administrati on 35. 3(2001)242-257. Yong, Deng and Moore, Thomas G. China Views Globalization Toward a New Great Power Politics? The capital letter Quarterly 27. 3(2004)117-136.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.